The only constant in life is change.


Our nonprofit’s change was always coming, and we now announce and celebrate it. A lot has happened through the years that had led to our “why”, but if you just want to know about our new name and logo (the “what”) go to the bottom and you’ll read/see it. Click on any pictures in this post, and they’ll get larger for you.

From the moment that an ad-hoc group of us formed locally in response to Maryland’s creation of a lynching truth & reconciliation commission, we knew that there was a big job ahead regarding Howard County’s history. NO, that history didn’t just involve one young man named Jacob Henson, Jr. as many seemed dedicated to perpetuating. There was legally-sanctioned hanging activity here that went on into the 1900s, but there was also a time here when Black and white people worked together to try to save the life of a Black man named Amos as the county was being formed into its own entity in 1851. Threats of lynching happened here too into the 1900s.

Compiling the accurate story of lynching activities in the county took a lot of time, and that’s because many of the records that exist aren’t physically located in the county. In the meantime, we also worked to show other county history relative to the existence of slavery here. Why? Because we kept encountering people who had no idea that it existed in the county or Ellicott’s Mills where the “Quaker Ellicott brothers” came to set up shop in the late 1700s and it therefore couldn’t have existed there (as the prevailing narrative went). When we encountered someone from the local historical society responding publicly to our work with “We know about George” (Ellicott) but doing nothing visibly to depict him to visitors and students with the truths about him, a decision was made to enter the history realm as a local nonprofit just like they are to provide assistance that we believed was clearly needed. Desired is another matter.

Fast-forward to this past Black History Month 2025 when some of the research of this history nonprofit’s Executive Director was conveyed at the request of the then Executive Director of that other local history nonprofit at the headquarters of the only history nonprofit that was invited to have a presence in the county’s only public “Historical Center” (also the only county public library ever able to be named after a person here). Many of us have been wondering for some time how some history has been and continues to get celebrated/uplifted here, while other history isn’t. It’s a function of POWER, rooted in history. The power to tell stories that get amplified is as old as time itself. Once upon a time, you’d find a stump (or bring your own device) to simply deliver your discourse upon and hope that you were able to reach people who cared to stop, listen and maybe act upon. Over time, you’d try your luck at getting into the newspaper or a 30 second TV spot. Now thanks to the internet, you can have your own stump/podium again and it is virtual which lets you reach more people although those pathways are crowded with a dizzying barrage of messaging that some understandably opt not to try to use. Having the “likes” are nice; seeing the metrics about how many you are reaching regardless of the “likes” is better, I think. During Black History Month in 2025, scholarship was presented revealing that it wasn’t “just George” who engaged in enslavement, proven by a 1840s document showing Andrew Ellicott mortgaging several enslaved people. Will children here learn the history that their parents didn’t?

While I remain grateful for the opportunity extended by the county historical society to reveal what is a fraction of the research I’ve been doing about the county, it’s challenging to not see how power has operated here when it comes to the formative time in the county’s history. It got discovered and revealed in the work of the county’s second Public Spaces Commission (via 2022 Report Evaluation and Action Commission) that a 2004 focus group revealed a desire to be able to “Research local history and my family’s genealogy” and that some “would like to see the historical society and Columbia Archives more a part of the library.” The Commission found that since the year 2010 ONE history nonprofit (historical society) gets to operate while paying no rent in one of the most utilized buildings in the county public library system, while the Howard County Center of African-American Culture, Inc. has to use the resources it has to pay rent to the Columbia Association. It’s public information, so I’ll also write that the historical society has funds totaling almost $750,000 as of the end of 2023 that they count as assets. They’ve been around for a long time, so maybe that’s to be expected though surprising. It’s also impressive, and I think they’re “set.”

Some local history: In the year 1916, it was reported that ex Governor Edwin Warfield was once again the president of the Maryland Historical Society (had been so since 1913 and until his 1920 death). He and others had an understandable interest in the public acknowledgment of the Civil War history here regarding their relatives who served in the Confederacy. There’s a long story about the planning for a monument to the Confederacy here that involved James Clark, Sr. who was instrumental in getting legislation passed in the General Assembly to change Ellicott City’s charter so that it’s Mayor and City Council could acquire or receive land to create a public park where the monument could be built. The legislation was enacted in 1914. (Chapter 836, #68) In 1935, Ellicott City’s charter was revoked by the General Assembly. A monument to the Confederacy was eventually installed in the then front of the Howard County Circuit Courthouse in 1948.

The Brown v Board of Education holding that racial segregation in schools was unconstitutional was decided in the year 1954. That same year, a white man named Eugene Bryant was sentenced to be hung by Judge James Clark, Sr. He was found guilty in the Ellicott City court of murdering his pregnant girlfriend. When the report of his appeal got written, it was being called “barbaric punishment” to be hung. Judge Clark had just died. On November 15, 1955 the Sun newspaper reported that the Maryland Governor commuted Bryant’s sentence. Change to the way things were done was ahead, though some of us know that they were trying to exercise that same compassion to Amos in 1851 though it failed. And to Jacob Henson, Jr. to a lesser degree. Nicholas Snowden is just written off here by many, despite never having received his day in court. Many of us don’t like that.

In 1957, the Maryland Court of Appeals ruling regarding a school desegregation case was published in The Daily Record. Howard County citizens filed suit to try to block school desegregation from happening, but lost. The following year as the desegregation of public schools in Howard County dragged on, an entity called the Howard County Historical Society, Inc. was organized in 1958 by corporate charter and has primarily been crafting the history narrative here on certain county history ever since. They referred to themselves as “somewhat as an affiliate of the Maryland Historical Society” in their early newsletters. The MHS was formed in 1844, and as they wrote about themselves on their website: “Politics, wars, and the lives of notable men gave way to research and fascination with previously neglected fields such as women’s history, black history, and ethnic histories.” leading them to rebrand and change their name in 2020 “..for the future as an inclusive “center.” That Society is now know as the Maryland Center for History and Culture. The Howard County Society’s first president was the widow of Judge James Clark, Sr., Alda Hopkins Clark. She purchased an Ellicott City church (old First Presbyterian Church built in 1894) for the Society which was referred to as the Museum of the Historical Society by them. At one point, they referred to themselves as a “quasi-governmental agency serving the county.” An April 1988 HCHS newsletter carried the story of the Society’s founding, in the words of Clark descendants.

There has always been an official Howard County Interracial Commission or some iteration of the name since around the early 1960s. The first Commission of Human relations to be established outside of Baltimore was appointed by the Montgomery County Council on July 12, 1960. In Howard County, a non government sanctioned citizen committee was known to have existed at that time. In 1961 the First Regional Conference on Race Relations for the State of Maryland was held in Rockville, MD. Howard County was represented there. Most people don’t know about these activities, despite some of the people still being alive today. There’s a lot to be told and learned about how Howard County evolved into the place we all now experience. The lack of records here is striking, and a hindrance to those of us working to make the history here accurate. The work to bring history to the county involves others with and without corporate entities, so this list that follows isn’t exhaustive:

In 1992 the Howard County Center of African-American Culture, Inc. was incorporated. In 2002 the Friends of the Ellicott City Colored School Restored, Inc. was formed. Both worked to fill in the history gaps they saw here. In July 2002, the local historical society Board of Directors adopted a flag for itself that was designed by a Clark family descendant. The flag was “inspired by the headquarters banner of General Bradley T. Johnson.” Johnson had been a Confederate Brigadier General from another county, and it first seemed weird that the county historical society would seek to emulate him some research made it clearer: another Clark who did have roots in the county served under the General in the Confederacy. I respect the desire to acknowledge ancestors, and have no comment about the flag choice. It’s not on public property… and a private nonprofit can do as it wishes. People can choose to patronize ifthey wish.

In 2017, the matter involving the Confederate memorial on the county courthouse lawn got publicly addressed when Allan Kittleman was County Executive. Information regarding a 1988 rededication of the monument and a protest was written along with other material that was sent to Kittleman and the then County Council members. A ceremony was in the back (which used to be the front door), where the monument was located, and demonstrators were singing, etc at the front. How it got there on public property in the 1940s in the first place, is still a mystery. Who had the power to put it there is the real question. Nevertheless, it’s a PUBLIC SPACE not a private one. The monument got relocated over to the local Historical Society’s space… which is PRIVATE. They are now the guardians and keepers of that Confederate monument. Change happens. It doesn’t even have the names of all of the county’s Confederate soldiers: only select ones. This was the state of local county history that our nonprofit came to be formed subject to. People don’t always like change, but it happens anyway.


Since the new federal administration has taken office, people have been calling/texting and emailing to ask how our nonprofit is faring. Two images will be used to give the answer:

We’ve always understood that there are those here who adopt the “history is written by the victors” mentality. Our nonprofit doesn’t care about the “anti-DEI” efforts though we can see the people who seem to be emboldened by them. Despite the change of our name, our focus remains firmly grounded in our foundation: TRUTH. Our village contains the people in and outside of the county who feel the same. I think we’re good. If the primary source records we exclusively deal with are not believed and therefore incorrect, then does that mean they were falsified by the people who created them? A graphic about Lonnie Bunch III and a man featured in the Baltimore Banner digest for 4/15/25 convey our nonprofit’s sentiment and mentality. Our people are out there, and I’ve got no double they will continue to support our work.

Personally, I think there’s a problem when someone loves the fact that in America there were “Patriots” who wanted freedom from Britain’s rule and fought in what is called the Revolutionary War but dislikes or resists adopting the fact that Black and Mulatto people also fought in various ways for their family and friends’ freedom from enslavement and the right to participate in society as they saw born and naturalized American citizens doing.  Whenever I encounter the resistance in people, I appreciate that it’s out in the open for display. It takes time to understand why people believe and feel as they do, as well as patience. It’s unfortunate that everyone’s not teachable, particularly adults. Is the resistance because they were never taught in school or at home that people like Levi Gillis (a Mulatto man who was born free around the year 1820) existed who married, had children, worked for wages, moved to Ellicott’s Mills, and bought land from a Black man who had purchased it in 1834 (he was born free around the year 1790) to build a home for his wife and children in 1851?

When our nonprofit facilitated the research initiative that made the discovery regarding Levi and Eliza Jane Gillis’ log home relocated to Main Street in Ellicott City, I didn’t know what the overall response would be to it. Through presentations at schools, etc and walking tours provided, I could see the full gamut of responses: excitement, surprise, disbelief, and even anger. Even after we packaged and published the research into a book for others to learn from, I’ve watched as the log home went from being photographed multiple times a year with public officials proudly standing in front of it to make announcements to being ignored for the years since publication by them. While we remain grateful that HoCo Rec and Parks (via N. Mooneyhan and R. Delerme) placed our work inside of the Gillis home for the public’s consumption, it has been interesting to watch who seems to now avoid being photographed there. Is it because it has somehow lost its’ appeal? Is it now controversial (and therefore to be avoided by elected officials) in that it may make people THINK about how their history has been (and continues to be) generated for consumption by our students and visitors? Is it not worthy for our first Black Governor to visit? When you encounter the newest HCC Board of Trustees member H. Russell Frisby, Jr. let him know that you heard about his ancestor Levi Gillis and his log home now sitting on Main Street. He graciously provided our nonprofit a photograph of the 1882 marriage announcement between Katie Gillis and Hezekiah Russell for inclusion in the book our nonprofit published.

Kate was Levi and Eliza Jane Gillis’ daughter, and had been born around the year 1857 (possibly in their Ellicott’s Mills log home). Kate and Hezekiah had a son named George Levi Russell who was born in the late 1890s. By the 1900 census, they were all living in Baltimore. In 1940, George married Marie and had a son they named George Levi Russell, Jr. That George became the first African American to sit on the Circuit Court in Maryland and just died at the age of 96 and was featured in today’s Baltimore Banner newspaper. If you heard of Harbor Bank, that’s him. If you’ve heard of George Levi Russell, III, Chief Judge of the US District Court for the District of Maryland… that’s his son and Levi’s descendant. Levi lives on in their names.

Link to Baltimore Banner story about George Levi Russell, Jr death

It is OUR county that has the distinction of being where the last living signer of the Declaration of Independence called home. 2026 marks the 250th anniversary of that signing, and our county will be acknowledging history here in various ways. A Work Group was formed by the County Executive to compile the plan. Though us researchers are blocked from entry onto the Signer’s plantation home property (Doughoregan Manor) despite taxpayers funding of $19+ million under a development rights purchase agreement executed by County Exec Ken Ulman in 2010 (extended in 2020 and set to expire Sept 2025), some of us will be working to convey some of the truths regarding him. Though their real estate is private, the history is not. Change happens.


What’s our new corporate name? Drumroll please… After much deliberation about the state of things in our country today, our nonprofit board deliberated and decided on the following name which made the most sense given what we are actually known for and do:

HoCo Roots Revisited, Inc.

Here is our new logo:

What it symbolizes:

In 2024, an amazing set of records were discovered quite by accident at the Maryland State Archives while I was researching there. As the Civil War was ending and slavery was abolished in Maryland by the voters in 1864, there were some people who weren’t happy about losing their enslaved workforce. The new 1864 constitution abolished slavery, but it got revised in the year 1867. In that update was the provision that a Commissioner of Slave Statistics get appointed in various jurisdictions because “under the Military of the United States, a large number of slaves owing service to loyal citizens of Maryland, were induced to leave their owners and enlist in the military service of the United States.” The General Assembly ordered that a listing be made of any slave owners desiring compensation and those they were enslaving as of November 1, 1864, and some of the jurisdictions have compilation books of the time. Howard County has always had a book at the state archives. What was discovered were the actual handwritten loose documents from the enslaver wishing to be compensated. In the background of our logo is one of the pages photographed that was completed by John Lee Carroll, who was processing the estate for his deceased father Charles… grandson of the last living signer of the Declaration of Independence. John Lee Carroll wasn’t yet the Governor (would be in 1876). Why this particular page (there were several)? Because if you look carefully you’ll see that there are FOUR people named Charles in the image.

  • Charles Chase, freed at the age of 65 years old who was recorded to be a slave for life
  • Charles Branson, freed at the age of 2 years old who was recorded to be a slave for life
  • Charles Branson, freed at the age of 32 years old who was recorded to be a slave for life
  • Charles Carroll V whose estate they had all belonged to when he died in 1862

We have been revisiting the roots of EVERYONE in the history of the county when we’ve had reason to. Change happens, and is good. While we work to fully transition into our new corporate identity and website, know that we’ve been planning for ways to bring this newly uncovered history to students, visitors and residents. We recently acquired VR headsets that will enable us to show you things that may or may not physically exist anymore or have a limited ability for people to visit! Wait until you see what we’re planning on showing you! Wait until you experience Levi’s Trunk…

Marlena Jareaux, Executive Director

The only constant in life is change.

Finding Margaret within the new Longwood Public Garden

Ever since the announcement came out on Tuesday that a Public Garden was being created at the property called Longwood where Dr. Gustavus Warfield and his family once resided, a flurry of social media discussion has happened about it and contact to our nonprofit. A financial supporter of our nonprofit is a descendant of his. A focus group will be giving a report to the County Executive regarding what the property could potentially do for the county, and it may also be meeting in order discuss and hear from the public about it. That’s what’s hoped. There’s a real opportunity with this to do more than just admire and be amongst plants and flowers that we can see and whatever buildings that have survived. It’s known that 400k is in the proposed county budget for the garden, though the purchase price for the nearly 100 acres wasn’t disclosed. The county specifically wanted it to be known that it had been “preserved from development of more than 20 units” which implies what it does. It isn’t shown who is behind the Guilford Gazzette, but more local media is needed so their coverage of the announcement is uplifted in which they give the names of the people appointed to the Focus Group. History isn’t represented, but the group of 14 was formed in March when maybe the focus truly was just on plants and nature. That should evolve.                 

Longwood is in the West Friendship part of the county. At the moment, it is owned by Walnut Springs Nursery, Inc. until the sale or transfer. Many have known about the structures on the grounds for a while, largely thanks to the MHT inventory form about it created by a State Highway Administration consultant in 2013. There was an attempt to locate anything regarding the 1800s ways and practice of medicine at the site, and the medical office that was on site was noted to have been extensively altered which made it not eligible for the Register under criteria A. There are many parts of the chain of title that alert folks to the fact that it isn’t complete. “This is possibly, but not definitely, the property that became Longwood.” and “Unclear how many acres the property contains.” are dead giveaways. By now, many know that the accurate title work done under the auspices of our nonprofit on the log house in Ellicott City revealed that the ownership narrative had been incorrect for 40 plus years. Longwood’s history and who owned exactly what and where would have to first be done. Accurately. That’s for a very good reason…

Celia Holland wrote about Longwood in her 1987 book, and her archive with research notes is housed at Univ of MD College Park Library Special Collections where it has been used by history researchers for years. She was called the “unofficial county historian” for years, and her work was heavily consulted by many when the inventory forms were created. The owner of Longwood from the 1800s was Dr. Gustavus Warfield, whose father was Dr. Charles A. Warfield of Bushy Park. There is also a cemetery there. The local Howard County Genealogical Society, Inc. inventoried the cemetery on Longwood in 1975. Most of the headstones visible there at that time were catalogued to belong to Gustavus’ family. And then there is Peggy. First and foremost, her legal name was Margaret Fosset. When the announcement was made about the Public Garden, immediate speculation occurred about it being a place where slave burials exist just as what happened with the recent local St. Mary’s Cemetery story in the news. Many people are looking for the answer to where their ancestors who died while enslaved were buried here in Howard County, without realizing that the answer isn’t definitively known (yet). And that shouldn’t be rushed. Longwood will help us, if it’s done deliberately and accurately. Peggy/Margaret can help us, just like Levi and his wife Eliza Jane Gillis do in Ellicott City.

Everyone goes to those inventory forms for history, and they just aren’t always entirely accurate as was shown with Levi and Eliza Jane’s log home. The Longwood form contains info about the cemetery and the sixteen markers. Yes, the family member’s markers are there as is one for “Peggy Fosset” who the author wrote “..was likely a slave”:

IMG_2240.jpeg

Elsewhere within the document, this is found that there is an “old burial ground for slaves” and a headstone with the inscription here:

IMG_2245.jpeg

In 2004, Peggy’s marker was photographed in relation to the rest of the markers.

So, everyone assumes that Margaret Fosset died in 1865 as the Civil War was ending as a slave? That’s INCORRECT.

Margaret Fosset died at the age of 70. That made her 65 for the 1860 census. Yes, Gustavus was enslaving sixteen Black and Mulatto people between the ages of 8 months and 76 years of age in 1860. None were a female of Margaret’s age. On the 1850 slave census, Gustavus was recorded with 15 enslaved people from the ages of 4 months to 80 years old, and had a Presbyterian minister in his household. In 1840, he was recorded with 18 enslaved and 13 free Black and Mulatto people in his household of 41 people. Margaret Fosset was a 60 year old FREE Mulatto woman recorded in Gustavus’ household along with Rezin Bond, 60, who was a free Black man. Eliza Johnson was recorded to have her own household nearby, and was a 60 year old free Black woman. A decade prior to that in 1850, Rezin Bond had his own household with Jane (possibly his wife) and children. Margaret was recorded to be in the household of Gustavus’ daughter, Elizabeth R. Snowden, who resided in a structure on her daddy’s land. Later, it would be said that Elizabeth lived in a cottage on the property. When, for how long, and did it survive? Eliza Johnson, then 50 years old, was also recorded in the Snowden household. That means she got her own place somewhere at some point in the next 10 years. Snowden was recorded to be enslaving a 12 year old female in 1850. Whose child was she? Was she there long enough to see Gustavus’ son-in-law Richard allegedly enter the Confederate military? Did Margaret know that? Did Margaret even lay her head there to sleep, and if so, where? Who put up that marker for her? There are 2 markers in the old photo, one leaning against the other. Whose is that and where is it now? When exactly did “Mr and Mrs Warfield and their children” put the headstone up for her? Is she really buried there? Is any of Gustavus and his family’s enslaved workforce like the 80 year old man Gustavus had been enslaving in 1850 buried anywhere on the grounds that remain of Longwood? It will take someone specially skilled in ground penetrating radar for burials from the 1800s to learn for certain, because of the nuances and research/knowledge needed about topography etc that those folks understand. Where is that 80 year old man buried if not there?? Rezin?? Eliza Johnson??

If this is to truly be a Public Garden that endeavors in any way, shape or form, to do justice to the early history of that land that resident and visitors will be going to and possibly pondering the history and what’s valuable for us to remember… it needs to be done with ACCURATE info with the best people who know how to do the work. Because while the bodies of enslaved Black and Mulatto people MAY have been buried on the land that remains of Gustavus’ land, Margaret Fosset was NOT one of them. I’m completely justified to go so far as to ponder, “did Margaret ever run into Levi and Eliza Jane Gillis?” Did she have to go into Ellicott’s Mills, as many people did for things back then? Did she interact with the B&O station there? Gustavus died a year after Margaret, in 1866. What were their interactions about as the war was concluding? I know the names Jane Watkins and her infant child who was enslaved by Gustavus. I know the names Cephus and Peter, enslaved by Gustavus, who were placed in jail in March of 1863 because the family was afraid the two would cause them harm as the war went on in the country. I could go on and on about the things it’d be great to continue researching to find as that Public Garden comes into being whatever it will be dreamed it can become. I first wanted people to maybe get interested in learning the true history there. Getting it will be another matter. Deciding what to pushing out to residents and visitors is still another matter. This type of history, done correctly with accuracy in mind first and foremost, can really change things in our county. Some of us are working on balancing the narrative here in the county, but there are only so many hours in a day and lots to do to compile it. Hopefully, this will help us in endeavoring to join the surrounding jurisdictions who do this type of history wonderfully. Truth first though.

Marlena Jareaux

There is also Nelson, Daniel Carroll, and others to consider.

The Sun April 17, 1847 advertisement

entry for Margaret has this inscription, which seems incorrect and varies from the one recorded on the inventory form. Suggested edits were submitted to the entry to make that more accurate (and were recently accepted which make this more accurate): https://www.findagrave.com/memorial/48072423/peggy-fosset

The Research of Runaway Advertisements

During February in the year 1847, Charles G. Haslup near Savage Factory in what is today Howard County, Maryland made arrangements to place an advertisement in Baltimore’s The Sun newspaper. A few days before on Monday, David self-liberated from Charles’ enslavement. As can be seen in the advertisement, Charles was offering $20 to anyone who could find David and take him to a jail so that he could be returned to his position of servitude. But what was David’s position? The advertisement doesn’t provide any information about that, but does provide a description of David which can be read.

Baltimore Sun advertisement regarding David

David had been enslaved by Haslup, a name known by many in the local area due to him having been a Constable and Tax Collector. Imagine an eighteen year old, five foot tall “bright mulatto” with a velvet cap and striped vest on wearing an old pair of lace boots, and you’ll be meeting David when he decided to secure his freedom on his own. Charles Haslup was one of the people who placed his name onto the list of enslavers who wished to be financially compensated for his “losses” that were the result of slavery being ended for him by the state.

David’s name didn’t appear on Haslup’s list, but seven other people’s names were listed. Does that mean that David got away? No, it does not.

The reason that people shouldn’t make assumptions when viewing runaway advertisements is that it’s usually only a small part of the story. Was Haslup placing the ad because he was the enslaver, or was he just the agent for someone else? In David’s case, there was a fascinating story to be assembled about him that I will share here so that people know a bit more about what is involved when trying to get this right about the local Howard County story of this particular type of self liberation from enslavement.

First, David was captured by someone and put into jail to await Haslup. He was actually in the jail when Haslup placed the advertisement in The Sun. That probably resulted in a bunch of people scouring the area looking for someone that fit David’s description because Haslup or his agent paid to have the advertisement run seven times, though a $20 reward wasn’t much even for that time period. Was there a reason that it was so low? Maybe. It turns out that this wasn’t the first time that David had tried to self liberate from Haslup. Because of that, Haslup made a request to the court to be able to sell David out of the state of Maryland.

Courtesy of Maryland State Archives

 

Here’s where research patience and persistence come in handy. Haslup’s request wasn’t acted upon right away, and every day that David was in the jail meant the accumulation of jail fees that he’d be responsible for paying. So, David was released on February 12th, and back to Haslup he went. But there’s still more…

David didn’t get sold by Haslup. In 1848, Charles G. Haslup became the Sheriff of the Howard District and he’d remain the Sheriff until Howard became its own county in 1851.

While Sheriff, he made another request of the court regarding David in May of 1849. The Sheriff reported to have gotten possession of David’s mother through his father’s estate. David’s mother had been freed by this time, and she was recorded on the 1840 census as the free Black head of her household. Letty Daily had two boys under the age of ten living in her household with her, both born free.

1840 census with Letty

David was therefore still enslaved while he had younger siblings and a mother that were free. These were the circumstances that existed when David kept leaving Haslup’s. In 1849, Haslup’s legal request sought to sell him out of the state so that he could be compensated for the trouble and money he believed David’s actions had cost him. David was at the trial and heard it all. The court ruled to extend David’s enslavement period to a total of thirty two years, and authorized Haslup to sell him in or out of the state.

That’s not the end of the story though either.

By the time the 1850 census taker came around, he recorded the occupants of Sheriff Haslup’s household. His wife and children were recorded along with a sixteen year old girl he was enslaving.


Also in the household was Letty’s son David, recorded to be free.

Daily in Haslup 1850 household

What’s the likely conclusion as to how? Letty purchased her son David’s freedom from Sheriff Haslup, and then negotiated for his hire along with her son Wesley by the sheriff. Those two boys under ten recorded in her 1840 household? They may have been Plummer and Nathan who each asked that certificates of freedom be issued to them in 1860.

Plummer and Nathan’s certs courtesy of Maryland State Archives


Those connections are for another day and project. Our work will live online ultimately so that schools, etc can access and learn from these stories but we will also make them into a publication to achieve the same goal. We began our The Resistance Project some time ago by collecting data from multiple sources. Our event on September 1st is the public introduction of it. There are easily more than a hundred “runaway” situations involving the land that is now Howard County, and many were never advertised. Most had interesting stories like David’s, all were unique. The determination for where David may have been when he self liberated will lie from what property Haslup owned at that time. On the 1860 map, you’ll see that there are two for CG Haslup. Must be fully researched, and will be.

 

Sheriff Haslup died in 1876 and is buried in Savage at their family cemetery.

Courtesy of FindAGrave.com

What’s In A Triangle?

What in a triangle? In the case of the right lower panel of the Howard County flag, it’s the shape of the county itself that is in it. But what does the yellow triangle symbolize exactly?

The county webpage about county symbols says that it’s actually a gold color like the wheat at the top left panel. Whether it’s yellow or gold, what does it mean?

This is a follow-up post to the one done last week regarding county council bill 31 that seeks to permanently enshrine the date that the 1968 flag into the county code. That post, for those who haven’t read it, can be read by going here:

A County Flag Was Born, But Who Birthed It?

First, what has been written about what the image is supposed to convey? The county webpage has the following: “.. a green outline of the county is set in a triangle of gold symbolizing the unique position of Howard in the future development of the eastern seaboard.” There’s no notation for who said that or where that information comes from. In the newspaper article announcing the flag given to the commissioners, it was written:

So, “county’s industrial future.” Is the county known today for industrial things? Was that the plan in 1968? Possibly.

On Saturday I went to the state archives in Annapolis to scan through their collection of the Central Maryland News. I found an image and article in a 1964 edition that jumped out at me, and I think the reader will understand why. It was interesting to note that our county government was making deliberate efforts to have the county be in front of the world at the World’s Fair by having a two year exhibit there. “High type industrial development” was the audience being sought, but the county’s strategic location in the “Heart of six city Area” was depicted by the Planning Director via a triangle. Keep in mind, the year is 1964 which is four years prior to the flag contest and winning design and a bit before any shovels substantially broke ground to build Rouse’s Columbia. The Planning Director was noted to have shown that exhibit to the County Commissioners, and weren’t the commissioners also some of the judges for the flag contest?

 

Is that where Jean Hannon got the idea and inspiration to incorporate a triangle into the flag design? Noted that her triangle is more like a pyramid design and is the opposite orientation of the Planning Director’s, and also noted that the county has been zoomed in on by the Hannon design. I can’t determine the six points in the Planning Director’s image (I’m sure one of them is Philadelphia) but the points were supposed to mean something. What do the points in the Hannon triangle design refer to since it was inverted from his, assuming the corners do point to something?

This was the time in county history in which a Charter commission had released their recommendation that charter government get adopted in the county BUT that it be delayed for several years. That led to citizen activism which led to referendum efforts in order to put a stop to that delay. CB31 mentions the charter, but I wonder how many people know the history of the charter delay and fights that happened to finally get charter government in the county all during desegregation, federal civil rights legislation compelling local action, and county housing activism?

If the current bill passes with the goal of teaching others about this time period in county history, count our nonprofit IN.. though I hold to what I wrote last week that I’m opposed to having things made so that they don’t change.

Marlena

https://www.howardcountymd.gov/county-symbols

A County Flag Was Born, But Who Birthed It?

While people were putting their finishing touches on planned Juneteenth activities in the county, legislation involving history was introduced by the current District 5 councilman on the 7th day of the legislative session (June 5). I’ll be the first to say that I wasn’t monitoring council activities closely (it’s summer, beach season etc) and didn’t know it was happening until a person I consider to be a friend recently alerted me about it. Most of the current legislation are resolutions for board and commission appointments (the application process for which was just reported to have been updated by the C.E. to make it more transparent etc henceforth), but there are six bills as of today. The HoCo By Design bill is foremost in most minds and mine. But CB31 is pretty important because it seeks to intend to make “Howard County Flag Day” a permanent reality and significant thing here. Anyone hearing the news recently that our neighbor Frederick County just changed their county flag this month may have given some thought to our own. Our flag was put into place as the official flag during a time in our history when racial relations were at a fever pitch. The Civil Rights Act of 1968 was passed on April 10, 1968, one week after the assassination of Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr. Things were going to be changing in the county in the arena of housing just as it had been changed regarding desegregation of schools (not fully achieved in the county until 1965, almost 10 years after Brown v Board of Ed). As the Executive Director of a local history nonprofit, I don’t often have reason to provide written testimony in my professional capacity either for or against proposed county legislation, but last week I felt I had to and did. Here’s why…

 

I’m going to do my best to not make this personal or about Republican/Democrat while I know I can’t control those who will. I’ve never met the District 5 county councilman, and I am aware that in last year’s election he got a surprise endorsement by a group (and I do mean surprise) which caused a lot of people to take away the message that you should look at the INDIVIDUAL candidate as opposed to their political party exclusively. I don’t know the motivations of the councilman, and they don’t have to disclose who may be influencing/requesting their proposed legislation so I probably will never know. 

What I do know is that history narratives are changing in the county for the historical sites that still exist. In our county, most of the sites and former plantations that turned into farms were bulldozed over in order to create Columbia which was built on top of them. I also know that in 1968, a newspaper article reported that our county got a new official flag. That flag is the subject of legislation that seeks to change the county Code in order to compel County Executives to embrace and celebrate that particular flag design. I have questions about how public of a process it really was and if it was a process that captured the wishes of the many as opposed to those of a few. Those of us that research and study Maryland and local history know a lot about how the political regime worked back then (this is why they say that “history is political”) and POWER had everything to do with most things. Still does. The article itself that is being used for some of the history of the flag is interestingly right beside an article titled “Races Meet in Salisbury” in which the topic of discussion was the hope of easing racial tensions on the same day that our county flag was being flown over the circuit courthouse for the first time. The interracial commissions (state and local) are a topic area I’ve been researching and compiling info about since last year. Our county had one too, and the local commission I co-chair has been patiently waiting for the county to try to locate records involving it for months now for our use, and I’ll just write that it’s ALL fascinating history that our nonprofit is planning to bring to the community through future programming. Records First though, to get it right!

 

A few months prior, Elbert Flurry wrote an editorial to the same newspaper in which he expressed his views about the commissioners and other things in the county:

I’m not sure if Elbert was a Black public school teacher that moved to the county, but here is one I found in 1950 living in Pennsylvania:

While I have personal thoughts about the design that was voted to be the winner by people who I don’t believe to have been reflective of all of the county populace while Rouse was building Columbia, I have concern that the legislation goes too far to make it that we can’t embrace another flag design in the future that might seek to deliberately capture the wishes of all of the populace that would be subject to it. Particularly since no other jurisdiction could be found to have done this with their jurisdiction’s code. Worcester County on the Eastern Shore (think Ocean City) has an Editor’s Note that travels with their code, and it mentions who created their flag design but it only mentions the desire to describe the design elements… Not make a separate binding Flag Day out of it with proclamation obligations, etc. 

 

Want to be clear that this isn’t about the work that Jean Hannon did for the flag (she had the winning design), who I won’t pretend to know personally as local preservationists in the county did. She and the organization she led was partly responsible for the preservation of the log house now sitting on Main Street, so I respect her love and dedication for the preservation of local structures that we can all enjoy today because they were saved. However, the “white European settler” narrative that was created about that structure in the 1970s obscured the truth about the actual pre Civil War Black origins of that structure that was built by a Mulatto man named Levi for his free wife and children. A research initiative of three researchers (myself included) that was sponsored by our nonprofit is what led to this fantastic historical discovery. We hoped for that new narrative/history to be shown for visitors in May to celebrate important history dates, and then Juneteenth, to no avail unfortunately. We are patiently waiting for our county to complete the necessary approvals for the language we suggested for the materials that will be inside (based upon our research that we shared with them).

Jean Hannon died without knowing this newly discovered history, but I’d like to imagine that she’d be receptive of the change as opposed to doubling down in order to resist it. Hannon is part of history now, having designed a flag in her lifetime. I’m sure she never expected that it’d be the one and only flag the county would ever have.

 

My testimony on behalf of our nonprofit submitted to the council on Thursday June 22nd via councilmail:

CB31 testimony.pdf

Marlena Jareaux

*Note: the county (in green) is wrapped in a gold triangle meant to represent the county’s industrial future, according to the newspaper article. This must have been meant to represent changes due to Columbia being built.

 

A survey of other jurisdictions and reference to flags:

BALTIMORE CITY:

CARROLL COUNTY:

PRINCE GEORGE’S:

GARRETT COUNTY:

 

ANNE ARUNDEL COUNTY:

CALVERT COUNTY (NO PROVISION IN THEIR CODE):

DORCHESTER COUNTY (NO PROVISION IN THEIR CODE):

FREDERICK COUNTY (NO PROVISION IN THEIR CODE):

MONTGOMERY COUNTY:

WORCESTER COUNTY (CONTAINS REFERENCE TO DESIGN PERSON):

HARFORD COUNTY:

CECIL COUNTY:

WICOMICO COUNTY (NO FLAG, BUT THIS IS SEAL INFO):

KENT COUNTY:

OUR CURRENT COUNTY CODE:

 

Hard History in Howard County

The phrase “hard history” isn’t new, and the reason I’m using it for the history time period I primarily focus on is probably obvious to many. It’s things that are hard to think about considering the 2023 lives that many people have. Whenever you’re the person doing this type of work,  you often hear things of soft protest like “No one here was alive during that time so why does this matter?” or “Why stir things up with this history?” As I’ve told people, the protest here in Howard has progressed to people warning me that the recent examination into Charles E. Miller for the local public spaces commission I co-chair was going to bring “some heat.” My personal favorite thing was being told that two white women who are county employees seem to enjoy referring to me as “the Black devil.” The words of my white mother’s reminder always help me in these situations: “they meant it for evil, but God meant it for good.” I’m certain that I’m called worse, and it says far more about them than it does me. They’re obviously uncomfortable with what the realities of accurate local Black history mean for all of us, since it often actually reveals the generational inequities that existed between many white and Black families. If you were forced to work for someone to effectively help them build generational wealth for their family, you understood what you were likely never going to achieve for yours (and you adjust). I’m talking about slavery and also many of the forced apprenticeship contracts of free Black children, by the way. Fast forward to the time of Charles E. Miller and some of the men of his time who were early developers in our county. How do you think it felt for Black residents who lived here who saw him get appointed to fill a public county commissioner seat while he was creating a development in which property would be sold that restricted the “lot and any part thereof shall not be used, occupied by, or conveyed to a person, or persons, of Negro descent or extraction”? Yes, he was a man of his time, and yes everyone here didn’t do it. The question for the reader is, how do you think Black residents and prospective residents felt about it in the late 1930s and 40s?

I get it that I do history differently here. That seems to bother some people who have done history different from the way I do it. I get calls and texts from people sharing the words written by those they see who dislike me doing history this way. I have always examined things from the perspective of the humans who were/are involved, and approach things from an anthropological standpoint which tracks to my schooling. I also examine systems to try to understand why things were created and what they depend upon in order to exist and function. I really like how that makes me different from them, and it has so far led to my discovery that Frederick Douglass spoke in our county, the discovery of the oldest Black church of our county, and the creation of the Roundtable research initiative which discovered the true Black origins of the log house that residents and visitors have oohed and aahed over for decades.

A social media post was brought to my attention a few days ago, and I wanted to bring attention to it here. A local for-profit tour company was posting about it, and I really appreciate seeing history involving Amos Matthews who was in the US Colored Troops being showcased. In a store window on lower Main Street Ellicott City is this display with a framed piece:

I don’t know who created the display, but I do know that they have it wrong and I’m fairly certain I know why. The creator focused on the newspaper report of Amos being drafted. In the picture I can see the blow-up of the newspaper with Amos and James Treakle’s names. Amos is listed as a slave of Treakle’s. Was he though?

First, I’m not certain that Treakle was a “tenant farmer” of Charles Carroll’s on Doughoregan Manor. That Charles was the grandson of the last living signer of the Declaration of Independence Charles. Yes, there were several white tenant farmers who lived on his property through the years. But Treakle, who was NEVER a “commissioner” as has been inaccurately said about him (he was a justice of the peace for quite some time, and he or his father was a constable in the early 1830s), was listed to be the owner of quite a bit of real estate on the 1860 census. Was he a white tenant farmer of Colonel Carroll’s who was under an arrangement to pay for the taxes for the property he and his family paid rent for? Perhaps, but surely records would reveal that. I’d like to know, since it provides an interesting dynamic to history interpretation of census materials if it’s true.

Getting back to Amos, the true focus of this post. The display reads “Despite his enslavement, Amos was drafted…” and I’m going to pause here. From his service records, you can clearly see that Amos volunteered for military service when he enlisted at Georgetown, DC on October 12, 1864. Twenty year old Amos was 5 foot 8 inches with a brown complexion, and he signed up for one year of service. He was also paid a portion of the bounty he was entitled to, which you didn’t get if you were enslaved. I can see that also on his service record. On another record, he was noted to be “Free”. See for yourselves…


I suspect I’ll be labeled a “Black devil” for wanting this history to be accurate for every person walking down Main Street in Ellicott City for the remainder of Black History Month. For those who have already seen it, you now have the accurate story about Amos but there’s more. Yes, he did have a short time in the military and did die and is buried in South Carolina. No, I don’t think it true that “Amos had been enslaved all of his young life..enjoying freedom for a short two months” from what I have. Treakle didn’t put his name on the list of enslavers who wished to be financially compensated after slavery was abolished, nor did his heirs.  But I can tell you something about people I suspect were family members of his who had an experience with Treakle while Amos had gone off to fight in the war, if you want to know.

Elizabeth Mathews, age three, was indentured by the Howard County Orphan’s Court on the day that the state’s new constitution abolishing slavery went into effect. She was to learn to be a housekeeper, and serve in that capacity for Treakle’s family until she reached age 18. So was Henrietta Mathews, age eight MONTHS, and Alice who was six. Richard who was five, was to be his farmer until age 21. Here is his indenture contract, along with the first part of George Mathews’ who was eight years old:

Whose children were they? I’ll tell you that another day. When the 1870 census got done, Treakle was reported to own $10,000 worth of real estate. The census taker also recorded four young Black girls in his household and one was “Alice” who was about the same age as the Alice apprenticed to Treakle in 1864. I don’t know if it’s the same Alice, nor do I know (yet) whose very young children they were.

This would have been prior to Treakle’s official purchase of part of Doughoregan Manor which was recorded in 1878 (book 38 page 651).  James’ four sons would receive the property from him in 1881 before he died (book 43 page 216). The names of two of his sons (Emmett and Albert Treakle) can be found on the Confederate memorial housed by the Howard County Historical Society, Inc.’s museum. They fought on the opposite side of Amos. How do you think Black people felt about that? Here’s the Treakle land at Doughoregan, shown on the 1878 Hopkins map and on a drawing made for a Carroll family lawsuit involving the division of the land being fought over:

treakle on doughoregan

Were there Black people forced into enslavement on the property belonging to the descendant of the last living signer of the Declaration of Independence? Absolutely! Stories for another day though. Today was for a line of the Mathews family.

Marlena Jareaux

 

Black History Event Feb 9th

For our nonprofit’s first event of many in the year that commemorates the anniversary of the Emancipation Proclamation taking effect, an exciting presentation is being given about local Black history. The area that would eventually become Howard County was comprised of both free and enslaved Black and Mulatto people in the decades leading up to the Civil War. In this presentation, historian Marlena Jareaux will share some of her research that seeks to uplift the scholarship and collective understanding of free Black and Mulatto people who were living among white and enslaved people in the area. This event will be a hybrid one. Space in the Charles E. Miller branch of the Howard County Library has been reserved for Thursday, February 9th from 12:30 to 2pm, and masks are required to help protect the limited number of participants that will be permitted.

For more information and to register:

click HERE

County History Does Change, Maybe.

As 2022 drew to a close, it was a natural time to reflect upon the year behind and the one ahead. Many people aren’t of the belief that history is exciting, and I often confess to not having had an interest in it while in grade school. Maybe that’s what the reader will also relate to. While I ponder what it is about history that ended up pulling me in, I hope that those reading this page have been pulled in by the way that our nonprofit has become known for doing history. The county has 4 nonprofits and one govt division doing history. Rec and Parks (Heritage department) is the govt division, and the rest of us aren’t. We all share in doing history.

During a recent presentation that I was asked to give to the Quaker/Friends congregation, I articulated who the various local organizations are and some of the differences between us. It’s not a bad thing that there are 5 of us, along with other individuals doing great work to put out information that they’ve used their time and energy to research and package. A question I get frequently is “why is there not just one history organization in the county?” and the answer I give is “It’s complicated, yet it’s simply because we are all different in how we do history which the county benefits from.” The nonprofit Howard County Historical Society, Inc. has been around the longest, but has increasingly reported (recently to news reporters) their self-reflection that they were aware that they needed to do better with Black History. We (Howard County Lynching Truth & Reconciliation, Inc) are the new nonprofit kid on the block. The Howard County African American Cultural Center, Inc. is a nonprofit that grew out of Wylene Burch’s frustrations (I’ve been told), and their collection of Black memorabilia etc is unmatched in the county. The Columbia Association has an archive that hold records pertaining to everything related to Columbia, Rouse, etc. County Rec and Parks (the Heritage division) manages historic sites in the county, including the recent addition of the Harriett Tubman Cultural Center property. You can take classes there in cooking, painting, ballet, and many other things (for a fee), while viewing pieces of county Black history therein.

Those of us who are historians, the type who get lost researching in the stacks as we lose track of time immersing ourselves in old brittle records containing handwriting that’s barely used anymore, are the ones thinking about something very important. We think about the people who go home and share the history they learned at places, and the students writing papers about history that they get exposed to. We are the ones who get bothered by history being inaccurate, and work to change it so that it’s accurate. It’s because we are thinking about how history has always been used and still is.

I finally visited the Tubman center in order to take in the history that was curated and placed there for visitors. Though there is nothing to suggest that Harriet Tubman came to our county on her many trips to free her family members from enslavement (none of her family was in our county), the legend that she came here to help others escape enslavement is a feel-good story that has helped our county tap into the events in the state that celebrate a woman known throughout the world. That helps to put us on the map in that genre, so to speak, even though our county isn’t actually reflected on the state map (link is below). Fortunately for our county, there are many local people who tried to escape enslavement (some succeeded) and there is existing documentation to support it. You won’t see them at the Tubman Center except for Oliver Cromwell Gilbert who was extensively researched by Stefanie Gilbert (his great great granddaughter) and Jody Fernald and published in a 2014 journal, but it’s my hope that that will change in 2023.

Documentation is king with history, and people learn critical thinking skills when they are able to examine things in order to discern what is and isn’t proven by them. It’s a skill I believe to be in alarming decline, and I hope that changes since it affects other aspects of life also. Due to the responses I’ve received from some people I don’t choose to name, I believe some are unaware that history evolves when you discover and learn more, and change makes some uncomfortable. I suspect our programming will step on some peoples’ toes, which under the circumstances is unavoidable. 2022 saw altercations with people and organizations unhappy with the alteration of the local history narrative that our nonprofit has become synonymous with affecting. You wouldn’t think that was a bad thing, yet I’ve received messages that I can’t repeat here and have been told that I’m being called something by county personnel that I choose to not repeat. This is what happens when you try to change things that some are comfortable with and others don’t want to change because of how they are benefiting from it being how it is.

The history in the Tubman center concerning the county’s segregation era is compelling and well-done! I expected no less since the Tubman Foundation folks have been the primary holders and compilers of the materials for decades. I was glad to finally be able to see it, and those curators should be proud that their experiences are there for all of us to learn from. However… everyone who goes there should remember that our understanding of history isn’t static and therefore changes when we learn better. The log cabin/house on Main Street did NOT exist in the 1700s, is not the oldest structure in Ellicott City, and the predecessor congregation to St. Luke did not exist in it in the year 1877. The data in this image is wrong.

They had their own building and continuous land ownership in Ellicott City after they bought land and constructed their own first church building in 1860. They didn’t need to use the log cabin for anything, since they had their own. That church is the oldest Black congregation in Howard County (it is not First Baptist Church in Elkridge), and should be recognized as such. The church trustees later sold the land and building to a Black woman who lived in it for many years. Research/p and documentation uncovered all of that and more, and it’s been widely circulated since February 2022. It’s a great photograph by Donald of the newer church, but the display otherwise contains old inaccurate information from a time when a full investigative inquiry wasn’t performed to try to uncover the truth. It has been done, and no one need think for one day in 2023 that a white European settler built that cabin in the 1700s. Will the data be changed? Maybe not since one of the other nonprofits (HC Historical Society) is who did the display according to the exhibit. 

As I conveyed to the Quaker Friends, I only want history to be accurate for peoples’ consumption. The visitors, residents and students of the county should not be thinking that:

  1. slavery didn’t really happen in our county
  2. our county wasn’t also part of The South, and acted like it in many ways
  3. Blacks didn’t own land in Md before the Civil War in their own names
  4. we didn’t have significant and compelling examples of self-liberation from enslavement by local people who have descendants in the county
  5. our county wasn’t connected to the early civil rights effort
  6. we didn’t have our own housing segregation like it’s reflected in the Undesign the Redline exhibit at the library.

If you do think these things, it reflects that you just haven’t been told differently and you aren’t seeing it reflected anywhere in the county. Yet. The only constant is change, therefore change is the thing to value. See you in this new year (the anniversary of the Emancipation Proclamation) with programming and content based upon all of the research being done in the areas above and more! We’ll be freeing it in 2023!

Marlena,

Executive Director

Link to Tubman byway sites:

Byway Sites

Book Fundraiser

Hello friends…

As we all come to the end of another year, I am as usual reflecting upon the next year ahead. There is much to be excited about, and there is also much work to still do. Our nonprofit has only just begun (literally and figuratively) in our efforts to uncover and document the accurate local history of the county so that we can all better understand the climate and culture in which our county’s lynching (and near lynching) victims (and their descendants) lived. One of our biggest achievements in 2022 was our nonprofit’s sponsorship of the research effort that led to the discovery of a pre Civil War Black community in Ellicott City. A 200+ page book has been made with the findings, and those findings are the tip of the iceberg of additional material calculated to ensure that accurate local history is told and consumed by our visitors, residents and students.

It is my hope that those who enjoy our work will consider donating to our nonprofit by purchasing a book for themselves or others through our book fundraiser. The details of that fundraiser can be found be clicking the link below. It’s my hope that a new standard of research will be created in our county so that accurate history can be consumed by our visitors and residents. History evolves when new materials are discovered to augment it, but history also evolves when primary source documents are excavated to create products and presentations for consumption. Reconciliation for a community cannot happen until the truth is first known. Actually and to be honest, reconciliation can be done without the truth being known. It’s just not the way I wish to be involved in doing it for the place I love. Hopefully, a majority of the people feel the way I do. Marlena

https://secure.givelively.org/donate/howard-county-lynching-truth-reconciliation-inc/newly-discovered-ellicott-city-md-black-history-help-us-to-treasure-it